Enter Email Address to Sign Up for Our FREE Email Newsletter

 

 

Proceed Carefully With Feed Alternatives

By Dr. Chad Hastad, Swine Nutrition Services, Inc.

 

With the high cost of feed, we get a lot more questions about “cheapening up” diets. Before we look at alternative ingredient options, there are a number of things you should be doing right now to counter higher feed costs:

  • Lower particle size to improve feed efficiency
  • Keep feeders adjusted correctly
  • Look at market weights and adjust down if it makes sense
  • Consider eliminating all fat from diets
  • Look at increasing inclusion rates of dried distillers grains (DDGs)
  • Evaluate how Paylean is being used
  • Work with your nutritionist/vet/suppliers/banker on farm to find ways to save dollars on your operation
  • Make decisions based on facts, not emotions
  • Look at feed budgets – are they correct and are they being followed?
  • Look at possible equipment changes to improve efficiency (feeders, waterers, etc)

If you are following these fundamentals, you can be more pro-active in looking at alternative ingredients. These could be any other energy or protein source. Our clients have fed a wide range of products, including pet food, sticky granola, Jolly Ranchers, brown sugar, corn flour, and soup mix by-product.

When considering any by-product, these are the questions you should be asking:

  • What is the nutrient composition? Table 1 shows the nutrient values of various grains and by-products compared to corn. Table 2 and Table 3 show maximum usage rates for common protein and energy sources.

 

Table 1: Relative Ingredient Values Compared to Corn

        

Corn

100

Bakery waste/cereal fines

105-110

Barley     

90-95

Dried distillers grains            

75-130

High lysine corn

110-115

High oil corn

110-115

NutriDense corn

110-115

Milo

96

Oats

70-80

Rye

80-85

Soy Hulls

60-65

Triticale

95-105

Wheat

105-107

Wheat middlings

90-95

 

Table 2:  Typical Maximum Usage Rates (%) for Common Energy Sources

Ingredient

Starter

G/F

Gestation

Lactation

Limitation

Bakery waste, dehy

25

*

*

*

High salt

Barley

25

*

*

25

High fiber

Corn

*

*

*

*

None

DDGS

20

20

30

5

Palatability

Corn gluten feed

5

10

*

5

High fiber

Corn, hominy feed

0

60

60

60

AA balance

Molasses

0

5

10

5

Low energy

Rye

0

25

25

10

Variability

Sorghum (milo)

*

*

*

*

None

Soy hulls

5

10

20

0

Low energy

Triticale

10

*

*

50

Variability

Wheat bran

0

10

30

10

Low energy

Wheat, hard

*

*

*

*

None

Wheat middlings

5

25

*

5

Low energy

Wheat shorts

10

40

40

40

Variability

                                                                                            Tokach 2007

Table 3:  Typical Maximum Usage Rates (%) for Common Protein Sources  

Ingredient

Starter

G/F

Gestation

Lactation

Limitation

Alfalfa meal, dehy

0

10

25

0

High Fiber

Canola meal

0

15

15

15

Anti-nutrition

Corn gluten meal

10

30

*

10

AA balance

Cottonseed meal

0

10

15

0

Low lysine

Meat and bone meal

5

5

10

5

High minerals

Meat meal

0

5

10

5

High minerals

SBM, extr/expelled

*

*

*

*

None

Soybean, full-fat

*

*

*

*

Overheating

Sunflower meal

0

20

*

0

Low energy

Yeast, brewers dried

5

10

10

10

Variability

                                                                         Tokach 2007

                                                                   

  • How variable is the quality of the product as delivered and how will I deal with the variation?
  • What form does the by-product come in?
  • How does the ingredient impact diet flowability, bulk density, and feed milling? For example, higher inclusion rates of DDGs will affect transportation. At 40% inclusion, a 24-ton truck may only hold 18 to 22 tons of feed. This will increase transportation cost per ton of complete feed.
  • Is bin space available?
  • How will the ingredient impact growth performance and carcass parameters (leanness and fat quality)?
  • Will the product be available consistently at an economical price?
  • Do I save enough money for the added risk?

If you can answer these questions and you believe the risks are worth it, use alternatives. There may be many of opportunities available to you locally if you look for them. Monitor performance carefully and make adjustments quickly if you have to.

 

Swine Nutrition Services Inc. & Dr. Chad Hastad consult with   80 clients, representing over 142,000 sows.  Swine Nutrition Services Inc. was formed in 2003 and provides consultation involving feeding protocols, developing feed budgets/programs, providing least-cost ration formulation, as well as the evaluation of other ingredients that may be available on a farm-specific basis. Contact: chastad@frontiernet.net or (507) 236-4217

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

Profitable Pork is published by Feedlogic Corporation. The information contained herein is not a substitution for professional services of any kind. The editor of this newsletter claims no responsibility for the use or misuse of the information.

Copyright 2008, Feedlogic Corporation. All rights reserved. Articles may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Feedlogic Corporation.